Reading: Commercialisation of impression creep testing

Download

A- A+
Alt. Display

Conference Paper

Commercialisation of impression creep testing

Authors:

T. Gallacher ,

Wood plc, Walton House, Faraday Street, Birchwood Park, Warrington, Cheshire, UK, WA3 6GA
X close

J. Eaton-McKay,

Wood plc, Walton House, Faraday Street, Birchwood Park, Warrington, Cheshire, UK, WA3 6GA
X close

S. Brett,

Steve Brett Consultancy Ltd, UK
X close

S. Jacques,

Wood plc, Walton House, Faraday Street, Birchwood Park, Warrington, Cheshire, UK, WA3 6GA
X close

C. Austin,

Wood plc, Walton House, Faraday Street, Birchwood Park, Warrington, Cheshire, UK, WA3 6GA
X close

A. Wisbey

Wood plc, Walton House, Faraday Street, Birchwood Park, Warrington, Cheshire, UK, WA3 6GA
X close

Abstract

Impression creep testing is a technique in which the deformation resulting from load applied via a rectangular indenter can be converted relatively straightforwardly into a proxy for creep minimum strain rate. This offers a valuable route to assess the creep performance ranking of in-service high temperature plant materials for a number of reasons: the small specimen size makes extraction feasible without significantly affecting the structural integrity of plant; the possibility to test a single specimen at several stresses or temperatures enables multiple assessments; and, increasingly, the maturity of underlying technical understanding and quality of results increases confidence in the technique. However, the method is not without challenges, in particular the capital and running costs associated with servo-electric test rigs. Development of a bespoke deadweight loaded testing system at Wood (formerly Amec Foster Wheeler) has enabled commercially sustainable impression creep testing, which has been successfully applied to ex-plant Grade 91 steel.
How to Cite: Gallacher, T., Eaton-McKay, J., Brett, S., Jacques, S., Austin, C. and Wisbey, A., 2018. Commercialisation of impression creep testing. Ubiquity Proceedings, 1(S1), p.19. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5334/uproc.19
3
Views
4
Downloads
Published on 10 Sep 2018.
Peer Reviewed

Downloads

  • PDF (EN)

    comments powered by Disqus